Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Did Obama just confirm Taheri?

Did Obama just confirm Taheri?

posted at 9:02 am on September 16, 2008 by Ed Morrissey

Glenn Reynolds takes a close look at Barack Obama’s response to Amir Taheri and doesn’t see any daylight between them. Yesterday, Taheri accused Obama of attempting to derail a status-of-forces agreement between the US and Iraq by telling the Iraqis to wait until after the American elections and stop negotiating with the Bush administration. Obama responded by essentially confirming Taheri’s account:

In the New York Post, conservative Iranian-born columnist Amir Taheri quoted Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari as saying the Democrat made the demand when he visited Baghdad in July, while publicly demanding an early withdrawal.

“He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview, according to Taheri.

“However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open,” Zebari reportedly said. …

Obama’s national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said Taheri’s article bore “as much resemblance to the truth as a McCain campaign commercial.”

In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a “Strategic Framework Agreement” governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office, she said.

Which is exactly what Taheri wrote. Barack Obama went to Iraq and interfered with the diplomatic efforts of the elected United States government, in a war zone no less, by telling the Iraqis to stop negotiating with the President. How exactly does that make Taheri’s column untruthful?

It wasn’t enough for Obama to fail at forcing the nation into a defeat in Iraq when he opposed the surge. Now he has interfered with our efforts to stabilize Iraq and provide for its security after the surge succeeded in keeping Iraq from falling into a failed state. And when he got caught working for failure and defeat, he tried making it into a smear against John McCain.

That’s not leadership America needs from a Senator, let alone a President. The Senate should investigate this as a gross violation of the Constitution and the separation of powers between the branches of government.

The Real Culprits In This Meltdown


By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Monday, September 15, 2008 4:20 PM PT

Big Government: Barack Obama and Democrats blame the historic financial turmoil on the market. But if it's dysfunctional, Democrats during the Clinton years are a prime reason for it.


Obama in a statement yesterday blamed the shocking new round of subprime-related bankruptcies on the free-market system, and specifically the "trickle-down" economics of the Bush administration, which he tried to gig opponent John McCain for wanting to extend.

But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street's most revered institutions.

Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.

The untold story in this whole national crisis is that President Clinton put on steroids the Community Redevelopment Act, a well-intended Carter-era law designed to encourage minority homeownership. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky subprime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but "predatory."

Yes, the market was fueled by greed and overleveraging in the secondary market for subprimes, vis-a-vis mortgaged-backed securities traded on Wall Street. But the seed was planted in the '90s by Clinton and his social engineers. They were the political catalyst behind this slow-motion financial train wreck.

And it was the Clinton administration that mismanaged the quasi-governmental agencies that over the decades have come to manage the real estate market in America.

As soon as Clinton crony Franklin Delano Raines took the helm in 1999 at Fannie Mae, for example, he used it as his personal piggy bank, looting it for a total of almost $100 million in compensation by the time he left in early 2005 under an ethical cloud.

Other Clinton cronies, including Janet Reno aide Jamie Gorelick, padded their pockets to the tune of another $75 million.

Raines was accused of overstating earnings and shifting losses so he and other senior executives could earn big bonuses.

In the end, Fannie had to pay a record $400 million civil fine for SEC and other violations, while also agreeing as part of a settlement to make changes in its accounting procedures and ways of managing risk.

But it was too little, too late. Raines had reportedly steered Fannie Mae business to subprime giant Countrywide Financial, which was saved from bankruptcy by Bank of America.

At the same time, the Clinton administration was pushing Fannie and her brother Freddie Mac to buy more mortgages from low-income households.

The Clinton-era corruption, combined with unprecedented catering to affordable-housing lobbyists, resulted in today's nationalization of both Fannie and Freddie, a move that is expected to cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars.

And the worst is far from over. By the time it is, we'll all be paying for Clinton's social experiment, one that Obama hopes to trump with a whole new round of meddling in the housing and jobs markets. In fact, the social experiment Obama has planned could dwarf both the Great Society and New Deal in size and scope.

There's a political root cause to this mess that we ignore at our peril. If we blame the wrong culprits, we'll learn the wrong lessons. And taxpayers will be on the hook for even larger bailouts down the road.

But the government-can-do-no-wrong crowd just doesn't get it. They won't acknowledge the law of unintended consequences from well-meaning, if misguided, acts.

Obama and Democrats on the Hill think even more regulation and more interference in the market will solve the problem their policies helped cause. For now, unarmed by the historic record, conventional wisdom is buying into their blame-business-first rhetoric and bigger-government solutions.

While government arguably has a role in helping low-income folks buy a home, Clinton went overboard by strong-arming lenders with tougher and tougher regulations, which only led to lenders taking on hundreds of billions in subprime bilge.

Market failure? Hardly. Once again, this crisis has government's fingerprints all over it.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Ah . . . Sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir


Excuse me Mr. Obama, I mean Senator Obama, sir. Um . . . know you are busy and important and stuff. I mean running for president is very important and . . . ah . . . I hate to bother you. I will only take a minute ok, sir?

See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.

Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time and says boy she wishes she had digs like this you know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow. I saw something like that in a museum once!

Oh, sorry sir. I didn't mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island? No, I didn't think so.

Well, listen, anyways, I can't seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be locked or not available. I'm sure it's just some oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are . . . I . . . I . . . have them written down here somewhere . . . oh wait. Sorry about the smears. It was raining out. I'll just read it to you.

Could you help me please find these things, sir?

• Your Occidental College records

• Your Columbia College records

• Your Columbia Thesis paper

• Your Harvard College records

• Your Selective Service Registration

• Your medical records

• Your Illinois State Senate records

• Your Illinois State Senate schedule

• Your Law practice client list

• A Certified Copy of your original Birth certificate

• Your embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth

• Your Harvard Law Review articles that were published

• Your University of Chicago scholarly articles

• Your Record of baptism

Oh hey . . . listen! I know you are busy! Is this too much for you now? I mean tell you what. I will come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you are busy, so I will just let myself out. I will be back tomorrow. And the day after. . . Oh and by the way, I have been wondering just why do they only show the front of your private plane on TV and not the tail where that great logo of yours was painted to hide the flag that was there before? Could you help me out here sir?

Thursday, September 4, 2008

A Star is Born --- Sarah Palin

Does any one remember what BO stands for?? As a reminder... Lifeboy really stops Beee Ohhh.. [body odor].. LOL


Night Two at the GOP Convention: A Star is Born

Posted by Chuck Muth
September 4, 2008 at 12:30 am

* OK, let’s flash forward to the future before we go back and look at tonight’s royal roasting of The Chosen One.

* Let’s say John McCain wins in November and then, as many suspect, doesn’t run for re-election. Folks, we could then be looking at a Sarah Palin-Hillary Clinton brawl for the ages in 2012 – and I’ll pay darned good money to see that one! But let’s move forward to the past…

* The evening got off the ground with speeches by corporate executives Meg Whitman and Carol Fiorina - both of whom were talked about as possible vice presidential candidates on McCain’s ticket. Both are obviously very smart women. Both are definitely women of significant accomplishment. And both were as boring to listen to as paint is to watch drying.

* Then came Mitt Romney - who warmed up the crowd with pretty much a standard stump speech with standard conservative political fare and a few pretty good lines.

* The former Massachusetts governor said it was time for a party of big ideas, not a party of Big Brother. And he called for a change from liberal Washington to conservative Washington. Solid, if not exactly scintillating stuff.

* Romney got off a great one-liner when he said it would help the nation conserve energy if we could just “keep Al Gore’s private jet on the ground.” The crowd ate that up.

* But it was something Romney said toward the end of his speech, subtle and almost unnoticed, which foreshadowed the rhetorical carnage to come later in the evening. Without mentioning anyone by name - and maybe this was unintentional (I doubt it) - Romney declared, “There’s never been a day I wasn’t proud to be an American.” Intentional or not, that was a right-cross squarely landed to Michelle Obama’s chin. And the Republicans were just getting warmed up.

* Mike Huckabee was next and again, delivered a pretty standard, flat, yet solidly conservative speech - getting in one great line about Sarah Palin getting more votes running for mayor than Joe Biden got running for president. It was clearly a joke, not intended to be taken literally. But as soon as Huckabee was finished speaking, MSNBC’s Keith Olberman felt the need to tell the world that Biden had gotten 18,000 votes in California, which is more than the population of Wasilla. What a schmuck.

* That was followed by Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle, who delivered a very mechanical, uninspiring speech but did nail the opposition on one of its chief attack lines. Responding to criticism that Sarah Palin is only the governor of a “small” state, Lingle noted that Alaska has the same number of electoral votes as Delaware, the home state of the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee. Sssss-lam.

* Oh, and for good measure, Lingle noted that you can fit 250 Delawares inside the borders of Alaska. Double-slam.

* Ru-dy, Ru-dy, Ru-dy!

* Holy cow. Where was this guy during the Republican primaries? Much like Fred Thompson last night, Rudy Giuliani delivered tonight perhaps the best speech he’s delivered this entire campaign. The former New York mayor was having the time of his life out there tonight. He was relaxed. He was energetic. And he was having fun…most of the time at Barack Obama’s expense.

* After running through John McCain’s history, background and experience, Rudy turned to “the other guy,” who, Giuliani explained, “worked as a community organizer.” After a brief pause and a chuckle he asked sarcastically, “What?”

* Exactly. The Democrats are so proud that Obama returned from his Ivy League education to become a “community organizer.” Sorry, but every time I hear that I can’t help but think, “Hey, so was Jesus Martinez, the Los Diablos gang-leader-turned-community-organizer on Hill Street Blues. Big deal. Know what I mean, homes?” But I digress…

* Rudy then ripped Obama’s “experience” in the Illinois legislature, noting that in those few brief years the Democrat presidential nominee couldn’t make a decision 130 times – alluding, of course, to the 130 times Obama voted “present.” Rudy belittled the man for being unable to make a decision; not knowing whether to vote yes or no. “It was too tough,” he said. And as Giuliani noted, to be President of the United States it’s not good enough to just be “present.” You have to make decisions.

* Rudy went on to note that Obama has “never had to lead people in crisis,” hammering home the fact that Obama has never led anything. “Zip. Nada.”

* On the central theme of Obama’s campaign, Giuliani noted that there’s good change and there’s bad change; that change in and of itself is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.

* On the serious issue of the war, Giuliani declared that “John McCain will keep us on offense against terrorists at home and abroad,” while reminding everyone that on the single biggest policy decision of this campaign – the vote on the “surge” of troops to Iraq – John McCain got it right and Barack Obama got it wrong. And Rudy’s right.

* Giuliani brought up the fact that Obama seems to continually change his mind on issues depending upon which way the political winds are blowing - especially when it came to responding to Russia’s recent invasion of Georgia. And he brought the house down when he advised that “If I were Joe Biden, I’d want to get that VP thing in writing.”

* In winding down and wrapping up Rudy asked, with all due righteous indignation, “How dare they question” if Sarah Palin would have enough time for her children if she was vice president, noting that no one ever asks that of a man. Damn straight, Skippy. For example, after Joe Biden tragically lost his first wife and child in an automobile accident, we’re told how he continued to take the train to Washington every day to serve as a U.S. Senator, even though he was, at the time, a single dad. Did anyone ever question Biden on that? Hell, no. Talk about a double standard.

* Giuliani did raise, however, one square which the McCain-Palin ticket needs to circle (or is it a circle that needs to be squared) – the issue of school choice. Rudy affirmed that the GOP is the party which believes parents should be able to choose where to send their kids to school. That means vouchers. John McCain, conservatives and Republicans agree. But back in 2006, Sarah Palin told the Alaska teachers union she didn’t support vouchers. This is an important issue I’d like to hear Gov. Palin discuss in much greater detail.

* OK. Move over The Chosen One. Here comes The Natural.

* If there was an “enthusiasm gap” between Republicans and Democrats coming into the GOP convention – and there most assuredly was – it was narrowed considerably with the selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as John McCain’s running mate five short days ago. And that gap was wiped out completely tonight.

* Oh, man…what a reception! And she hadn’t even said one word yet. Nothing like being attacked by the mainstream, liberal media to rally the troops.

* Poised. Self-confident. Charming. Likeable. Lovable. Palin rocked. Much like Barack Obama before his big speech a week ago, not only did the Alaska governor live up to the hype, she wildly surpassed it. It was a performance that most 20-year political professionals couldn’t have given. If any Republicans had any doubts as to whether or not Sarah Palin was ready for prime time – and many did – those doubts were erased away in all of about 2 minutes.

* Palin started by pointing out that her eldest son was being deployed to Iraq on September 11th, and that “as a mother of one of those troops,” John McCain is “exactly” the kind of man I want as commander-in-chief. That, ladies and gentlemen, is known as speaking with moral authority.

* Some of the talking heads after the speech criticized the amount of time Palin then spent introducing the rest of her family, but I thought it was perfectly appropriate. Heck, unlike Obama, Biden and McCain - all of whom have been on the presidential campaign trail for at least the last 18 months - Palin has been in the race all of five days. It was important and appropriate to use this opportunity to introduce her family to America.

* And boy, did she hit a sweet spot in saying that families with special needs kids “inspire a special kind of love.” As the mother of a baby with Down syndrome, that again is what we call speaking with moral authority.

* At about this point, Palin began rhetorically shoving pins into the invisible voodoo doll of Barack Obama she had in her pocket - doing so with wit, charm and an appropriate but healthy dose of sarcasm.

* But first a left-uppercut to Michelle Obama’s chin by noting that the same small town folks Barack mocked as clinging to their guns and Bibles “are always proud of America.” Bang! Zoom! Somebody get the smelling salts for Mrs. Obama!

* Of course, perhaps the best line of the speech was in saying that being a “community organizer” was the same as being a small town mayor - only without the responsibility. Pow! Right to the kisser.

* Palin then slammed Obama for trying to portray himself as this great defender of the working class while publicly campaigning in Pennsylvania, then belittling and ridiculing those same small town folks in a private meeting in San Francisco. Bam!

* While Palin’s best line may have been the one the mainstream press will write about tomorrow – the one about B.O. being a “community organizer” – my personal favorite was her kidney punch about how Obama has authored two self-serving memoirs but not one major piece of legislation. Whack!

* Yet another great line was in pointing out that some people (Obama) use “change” to promote their careers while others (McCain) use their careers to promote change. Ka-pow!

* Now, as a Nevadan I took particular pleasure in Palin turning her attention momentarily away from Obama and directing fire at Nevada Sen. Harry Reid. She noted that Reid saying he “can’t stand John McCain” means Republicans chose the right man. She then went on to say it’s not so much that Reid can’t stand John McCain as he can’t stand UP to John McCain. I think that’s called emasculating the opposition.

* In conclusion, Palin brought it all home by declaring that while Obama and Biden claim to be fighting for the little guy, “There is only one man in this election who has really fought for you.” Yes, indeed, this is truly a contest between an American Hero and an American Idol.

* According to one post-speech talking head, there was only one ad-libbed line in the entire performance, where Palin asked, “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.” What we have here, folks, is a political pit bull in lipstick and a skirt…not a pants suit. Joe Biden should be afraid. Very, very afraid.

* Going into the speech tonight, the big question on everyone’s mind was, “Is this woman capable of assuming the office of President if something were to happen to John McCain.” In my opinion, Sarah Palin definitively put that question to rest. A lot of veteran political observers far smarter than I have said the true mark of a successful president is his (now her) ability to communicate with the American people. In that regard, Sarah Palin clearly has “the right stuff.”

* And with all due respect to Dan Quayle, Sarah Palin is no Dan Quayle.

* In fact, I’m pretty sure more than a handful of Republicans, after witnessing Palin’s speech tonight, thought to themselves, “Dang! I wish she was our PRESIDENTIAL nominee this year.”

* And that, ironically enough, is the “problem” John McCain now faces. How in the world does he top Sarah Palin’s performance tonight with his acceptance speech tomorrow night? Answer: He can’t. He won’t. And he shouldn’t even try. The fact that he had the good judgment and the guts to choose her as his running mate is all anyone needs to know about his superiority over Barack Obama to be the next president of the United States…unless, of course, you think picking Washington insider Joe Biden as his running mate was an inspired decision.

* I’ll conclude with this: Yes, Sarah Palin hit it out of the proverbial park tonight. In fact, she hit it into the next county. But judging by the somber post-speech reactions by the likes of Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews and Andrea Mitchell, the path ahead is still fraught with trip-wires and booby-traps. It’s a long way to go before November 4th.

* That being said, if Sarah Palin asked me tonight to rejoin the Republican Party, it’d be pretty hard to say no. We are potentially looking at the future of the GOP - and I have to admit it’s more promising than anything I’ve seen since the Gipper left office.

* And I can think of far worse role models for my two young daughters than Sarah Palin. In fact, I think I’m gonna wake ‘em up at 3 am and take ‘em moose hunting!

* Now, will somebody please get that Obama carcass off the stage.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Sarah Palin Is a Godsend

Sarah Palin Is a Godsend for McCain

Tuesday, September 2, 2008 1:56 PM

By: Dick Morris & Eileen McGann

Republicans shouldn’t mourn the loss of the first night (at least) of their convention. Sarah Palin’s warm reception by the American people and the relative success of preparations to contain the damage of Hurricane Gustav seem to have given the GOP far more bounce than it would’ve gotten from a "conventional" first night in St. Paul.

We’ll never know just how much Barack Obama gained in the polls from his magnificent acceptance speech. He spoke too late on Thursday for any post-speech polling to be effective — and John McCain announced his selection of Palin the next morning.

So the Friday night polls reflected both the bounce from Obama’s speech and from McCain’s surprise — which seems to have neutralized the Democrat’s gains. (That night, Zogby gave McCain a two-point lead; Rasmussen found Obama three ahead.)

Our guess is that Obama’s speech had a huge impact — counteracted by a huge plus for McCain from his surprise pick of Palin.

Meanwhile, making up for the loss of the first night of the convention is the contrast between the chaos that greeted Katrina’s landfall in 2005 and this year’s smooth preparations. McCain, the administration and the GOP Gulf-state governors should all gain. At the very least, they’ve all shown that they’ve learned from the mistakes of three years ago.

Palin is a godsend to McCain. She injects charisma and novelty into what would otherwise have been a deadly dull ticket. She has a compelling record of battling corruption in Alaska — uncovering misconduct by fellow Republicans and beating a GOP pork-king governor in a primary.

And his choice of her suggests that the old John McCain — the bold, fighting Senate maverick — is back. (News that Palin’s daughter is pregnant should make no difference. The governor had disclosed the fact to McCain, and he, like the tolerant and wise person he is, accepted it.)

The Palin pick also aims straight at Obama’s biggest problem: his difficulty in attracting the votes of women over 40. To win in November, a Democrat needs to win this group by a wide margin, yet Obama now trails by four points.

Palin also makes it far harder to paint a McCain administration as a third term for Bush, yet the "Bush-McCain" charge lies at the core of Obama’s campaign.

What will be the next surprise of this remarkable political year?

Monday, September 1, 2008

Obama the Messiah is no more, we now have....

The Perfect Stranger ---Barack Obama

By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, August 29, 2008



Barack Obama is an immensely talented man whose talents have been largely devoted to crafting, and chronicling, his own life. Not things. Not ideas. Not institutions. But himself.

Nothing wrong or even terribly odd about that, except that he is laying claim to the job of crafting the coming history of the United States. A leap of such audacity is odd. The air of unease at the Democratic convention this week was not just a result of the Clinton psychodrama. The deeper anxiety was that the party was nominating a man of many gifts but precious few accomplishments -- bearing even fewer witnesses.

When John Kerry was introduced at his convention four years ago, an honor guard of a dozen mates from his Vietnam days surrounded him on the podium attesting to his character and readiness to lead. Such personal testimonials are the norm. The roster of fellow soldiers or fellow senators who could from personal experience vouch for John McCain is rather long. At a less partisan date in the calendar, that roster might even include Democrats Russ Feingold and Edward Kennedy, with whom John McCain has worked to fashion important legislation.

Eerily missing at the Democratic convention this year were people of stature who were seriously involved at some point in Obama's life standing up to say: I know Barack Obama. I've been with Barack Obama. We've toiled/endured together. You can trust him. I do.
ad_icon

Hillary Clinton could have said something like that. She and Obama had, after all, engaged in a historic, utterly compelling contest for the nomination. During her convention speech, you kept waiting for her to offer just one line of testimony: I have come to know this man, to admire this man, to see his character, his courage, his wisdom, his judgment. Whatever. Anything.

Instead, nothing. She of course endorsed him. But the endorsement was entirely programmatic: We're all Democrats. He's a Democrat. He believes what you believe. So we must elect him -- I am currently unavailable -- to get Democratic things done. God bless America.

Clinton's withholding the "I've come to know this man" was vindictive and supremely self-serving -- but jarring, too, because you realize that if she didn't do it, no one else would. Not because of any inherent deficiency in Obama's character. But simply as a reflection of a young life with a biography remarkably thin by the standard of presidential candidates.

Who was there to speak about the real Barack Obama? His wife. She could tell you about Barack the father, the husband, the family man in a winning and perfectly sincere way. But that takes you only so far. It doesn't take you to the public man, the national leader.

Who is to testify to that? Hillary's husband on night three did aver that Obama is "ready to lead." However, he offered not a shred of evidence, let alone personal experience with Obama. And although he pulled it off charmingly, everyone knew that, having been suggesting precisely the opposite for months, he meant not a word of it.

Obama's vice presidential selection, Joe Biden, naturally advertised his patron's virtues, such as the fact that he had "reached across party lines to . . . keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists." But securing loose nukes is as bipartisan as motherhood and as uncontroversial as apple pie. The measure was so minimal that it passed by voice vote and received near zero media coverage.

Thought experiment. Assume John McCain had retired from politics. Would he have testified to Obama's political courage in reaching across the aisle to work with him on ethics reform, a collaboration Obama boasted about in the Saddleback debate? "In fact," reports the Annenberg Political Fact Check, "the two worked together for barely a week, after which McCain accused Obama of 'partisan posturing' " -- and launched a volcanic missive charging him with double-cross.

So where are the colleagues? The buddies? The political or spiritual soul mates? His most important spiritual adviser and mentor was Jeremiah Wright. But he's out. Then there's William Ayers, with whom he served on a board. He's out. Where are the others?

The oddity of this convention is that its central figure is the ultimate self-made man, a dazzling mysterious Gatsby. The palpable apprehension is that the anointed is a stranger -- a deeply engaging, elegant, brilliant stranger with whom the Democrats had a torrid affair. Having slowly woken up, they see the ring and wonder who exactly they married last night.

letters@charleskrauthammer.com